M&A Science Podcast
 / 
Listen Now:

M&A Lawyers vs. Bankers

  Rob Kindler, Partner at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP

In this episode of the M&A Science podcast, Kison Patel sits down with Rob Kindler, a uniquely positioned dealmaker whose career has spanned both sides of the M&A table—law and investment banking. Rob previously led global M&A at Morgan Stanley and is now a senior partner at Paul Weiss. With 44 years of experience, he’s seen firsthand how the roles of lawyers and bankers have evolved, what makes a deal succeed or fail, and how today’s regulatory, activist, and valuation pressures are reshaping M&A execution.

Things you will learn:

  • Why legal advisors are now the first call in M&A, not the last

  • How corporate development teams have replaced bankers in early-stage deal sourcing

  • Why regulatory strategy and shareholder approval planning can make or break a deal

  • How to negotiate effectively by predicting “the end of the movie”

Paul, Weiss is a premier global law firm with a strong reputation in complex M&A, litigation, regulatory, and white-collar matters. Known for high-profile deals and elite talent, the firm regularly advises major corporates and private equity firms on the most critical transactions in the market.

Industry
Law Practice
Founded
1875

Rob Kindler

Paul, Weiss is a premier global law firm with a strong reputation in complex M&A, litigation, regulatory, and white-collar matters. Known for high-profile deals and elite talent, the firm regularly advises major corporations and private equity firms on the most critical transactions in the market.

Episode Transcript

M&A Lawyers vs. Bankers

Rob Kindler: Could kick things off a little bit by your background.

Rob Kindler:  I was brought up in Queens, New York, so that's close by.I went to school in upstate New York, Colgate University. Actually, my interests back then were music. I was a classical [00:02:00] musician. Never would've thought that I would end up doing what I'm doing. I've, to this day, by the way, I've never taken an Accounting I Economics course, but I went to Colgate, majored in English, then I went to NYU Law School, then to CR Moore for 21 years as an m, a lawyer, and then decided back in 2000.

Rob Kindler: To try investment banking. The world is very different now than it was back in 2000 when I made the move to investment banking, but I moved to investment banking first at JP Morgan. I was there for six years and ran the [00:02:30] M&A group there, and then moved to Morgan Stanley for 17 years where I ended up running the M&A group there.

Rob Kindler: I've actually seen both sides, the legal side, the investment banking side. And also have lived through lots of different turmoils in the financial markets, including black Monday in 1987 and a big downturn in 1991, the blow up of the tech bubble in 2000, the financial crisis. It's been an interesting 44 years.

Rob Kindler: Anything for the music [00:03:00] discipline that carried over to help you make deals? I actually think a lot of people who are musicians are pretty good at math. It just ends up in the same way of thinking. But I am still a musician. I actually take lessons from a member of the Philharmonic, so I'm still playing.

Rob Kindler: I actually play the flute, and as you could imagine, there's most leaders in M&A or flute players and romantic poetry majors.

Kison: Awesome. That's the exact affirmation. I needed to keep forcing my kids to take piano lessons, so. I'm curious about that transition to go from [00:03:30] law to investment banking and then back to law.

Kison: What are the motivators of doing that?

Rob Kindler: Back in 2000, I had been a, a lawyer for 21 years and a deal lawyer, and I just felt that I was age, I guess I was 46 at the time and I thought it would be good, lots of reasons to, to make a change and, and also the role of lawyers then was quite different than it is now.

Rob Kindler: Back then, the lawyers were basically the last people that heard about deals. The investment [00:04:00] bankers would put the deals together, they'd figure out what made financial sense, and then they go to the lawyers and say, why don't you go paper this deal? And I just didn't find that as interesting as I thought banking would be, which actually proved to be right.

Rob Kindler: The practice was very different also back then in 2000, most companies didn't have big business development teams. Now they do. But back 25 years ago, they really looked to investment bankers to help them source deals and analyze [00:04:30] deals. They had very, very little in-house. That's obviously changed in the last 25 years.

Rob Kindler: So I went through lots of thinking about how it would be a different challenge, something different to do. Although of course it had nothing to do with it. Bankers were making a lot more money than lawyers back then. So I remember talking to a friend of mine in the music business and explaining to him that I wanted to become a banker.

Rob Kindler: Really, it wasn't because of the money. I really wanted to become a banker because of the challenge of it. And my friend said, [00:05:00] we have a saying in the music business. It's not the money, it's the money. So I think that was actually a reasonable part of the motivation for a lot of people moving from law into banking.

Rob Kindler: But really it was because of the role of lawyers. For me it just wasn't as interesting as the role for bankers back then.

Kison: When you say that roles evolved back then, lawyers were last to know about it, and it sounds like it was pretty tactical in terms of putting together agreements. How has that changed today?

Rob Kindler: Things are dramatically different. I [00:05:30] said 25 years ago, in 2000 large corporations had very little by way of corporate development or business development, and they looked to investment bankers. They were house accounts that investment bankers had. And that really helps guide clients. Now, there's of course a very valuable role for investment bankers, but it's very different because all these corporations have very large corporate development staffs, mostly with former investment bankers.[00:06:00]

Rob Kindler: So they know exactly what deals are out there, and they know who to communicate with. They know what makes sense. Now. Bankers still have an important role. It's just a very different role than it was 25 years ago. On the other hand, it's now the lawyers who get the first call on deals. 'cause the first question that any CEO asks is, can I get this deal done?

Rob Kindler: Can I get it done? From a regulatory perspective, I'm not gonna bring the investment bankers in [00:06:30] until I know that this actually will pass muster and, and not just in the US. People focus a lot. On US regulatory. It's been very challenging in Europe for a very long time. And then of course there's issues when you do deals that have global implications.

Rob Kindler: So now you find that clients go to the lawyers first and they say, okay, what are the regulatory issues here? What's the best way of structuring this if stock is involved? Can we issue [00:07:00] stock of a foreign corporation in the US? It's really the labyrinth that people have to work their way through.

Rob Kindler: Bankers still, of course, have a very vital role, but what's not usually the banker's role is identifying opportunities. We're identifying which companies it makes sense to buy in the 23 or four years. As a banker, I really never heard a banker come up with an idea of a target company that the client hadn't already thought of.[00:07:30]

Rob Kindler: Now, where did the bankers bring value? And there's a lot of value. Well, first of all, they may have market intelligence as to whether or not that company would be interested in doing a deal. They actually might have a lot more knowledge about that than a corporate development person inside of a company would have.

Rob Kindler: Also, the most critical thing you think about from a company side when you're doing a deal is, what is this gonna do to my stock? How is the market gonna receive this? If you're issuing shares, [00:08:00] that's obviously important, but even if you're not issuing shares, you really wanna know, if I'm a CEO or a board member, I wanna know what this is gonna do to my stock?

Rob Kindler: How is it gonna trade? What is it gonna do to my capital balance sheet? Capital allocation ratings. Bankers are invaluable in that they just are coming in, in a, in somewhat later time in the process.

Kison: So the legal role has really evolved where now there's things you wanna address super early, like how regulators are gonna [00:08:30] look at this deal, which now goes everywhere in the world.

Kison: Yeah. That they're very proactive about oversight on the M&A activity. And then there's the actual structure of the deal. What's the best way to do that? And then just thinking about a lot of these risks early. And it sounds like likewise too, the banker's role has. Shifted to degree, where now you see corporations that have much bigger in-house corporate development functions.

Kison: It's doing a lot of the deal sourcing against their strategy, but then the lawyers are [00:09:00] still coming in with this broader universe view of. What the market looks like overall. They bring the relationships, but then also getting a sense of how this transaction is gonna impact, what's the market perception gonna be that would impact the price of the stock?

Rob Kindler: There's just a lot from a legal perspective now, and these corporations of course have very large legal staffs and they have very talented. General counsel who they rely on. They basically have become consiglieres [00:09:30] to the CEOs, which is great. You want to have someone inside who you can really count on.

Rob Kindler: Having said that, to have a trusted outside advisor law firm that can really tell you what hurdles they're gonna be to doing a deal is important. It really is important also in the banking side generally. I wouldn't want any of my banking friends to take this the wrong way, but the corporations now use lots and lots of different bankers.[00:10:00]

Rob Kindler: For large deals, they'll rotate between different bankers. It's very rare for a client to use a different law firm I'm talking about for big deals. If you're. If you, if Paul Weiss has a client that does big deals for sure, that client's going to use other law firms for smaller deals or that kind of thing, but they're gonna stick with that law firm.

Rob Kindler: I wouldn't wanna say that banking is commoditized 'cause it's not commoditized, but there is just something of a different relationship. And there's also circumstances [00:10:30] where it's important for a client to be using a bank that has the ability to finance a transaction. Often in that case, they may bring a boutique in and the boutiques are populated now with very talented bankers from former large institutions.

Rob Kindler: But it is something of a different role. It is a different role. And when we look at a deal, I obviously have been a banker for almost a quarter of a century. I bring a unique aspect to it because I can, [00:11:00] obviously, I'm not gonna act as the banker, but I can bring a perspective of this deal. I don't think it's gonna be well received because I think it's dilutive or it's outside of your core business, or you're gonna need to get shareholder approval on this.

Rob Kindler: We need to structure this so you don't need shareholder approval, and that's become another. Hurdle on deals generally you have a regulatory hurdle, but you also have a hurdle of getting shareholder approval. And if you are issuing more than [00:11:30] this is in the US, obviously if you're issuing more than 20% of your shares, you have to get shareholder approval for that, and that can be very challenging to do because activists and Arabs can get into the stock.

Rob Kindler: They could vote against the deal having nothing to do with the merits of the deal, so they can be shareholders on the record date for the vote and not even be shareholders when the vote happens. They may be hedging from the other side. They may be betting against the deal happening. [00:12:00] You need to think long and hard before you structure a deal that requires shareholder approval.

Rob Kindler: My mind is something that you really should try to avoid, not because you're against shareholder democracy, but because there's a lot of manipulation that can take place where people who genuinely aren't long-term shareholders can dictate the outcome because of an ARB or edge strategy. You mentioned activists and ARBs.

Rob Kindler: What are ARBs? It's just arbitrageurs who get [00:12:30] into the stock short term. There's always been merger arbitrageurs who get in and bet on whether deals happen or don't happen, but that's also part of a strategy that's often used. So for example, an icon has come in and announced the deals and taken a position before the record date.

Rob Kindler: So you announce a deal, but the record date for the meeting could be months away. Carl Icahn, obviously a very smart investor comes in and says, oh, this deal doesn't make any sense and I'm gonna vote [00:13:00] against it. And that's deal activism. But he may not even own the shares by the time that the deal gets voted on.

Kison: Ar eu

Rob Kindler: are arbitrageurs, they've been around forever.

Kison: It's the word of the day. How have you seen this evolve? It feels like there's more activism in general if you just look at your career over the past four decades. That's just part of the reason why it sucks to be public nowadays.

Rob Kindler: It's actually been around for a long time.

Rob Kindler: It is more prevalent now, but

Kison: now you have like X and people can go and tweet all this.

Rob Kindler: You have a [00:13:30] platform, but look, in the eighties, I worked on the other side of activists. In the eighties I advised Cummins. It's now called Cummins. It was called Cummins Engine in the eighties. They had activists come after them twice.

Rob Kindler: I advised CBS when Turner acted as an activist. This is all in the 1980s and early nineties, so activists have been around. The difference is that now they're actual funds. There are these large funds that act as activists [00:14:00] on balance. They've had. Generally there's returns all over the place, but these activist funds have had pretty good returns and remember that the people who are invested in these activist funds are the same people invested in all of these funds.

Rob Kindler: It's the same pension plans, it's the endowments of colleges, state pension plans, the California Retirement Plans. Certainly, I don't fault activism as an investment class. They're an investment class and it's just a different kind [00:14:30] of funds. But yeah, you do have to be very aware of what you are thinking of doing and how an activist will react to it in any deal that you do.

Rob Kindler: I actually think that's a healthy thing. We're living in an era now where there are no new conglomerates being formed. I was. Brought up, I started in the business in 1979 and we had these eras of conglomerates being formed like GE or Gulf and Western, or they used to call it Engulf and Western [00:15:00] and ITT Tyco, and that's not happening anymore.

Rob Kindler: Virtually all of these conglomerates have been broken up. A lot of that has to do with activism and still the case with corporations. There's an expression that corporations use, which is that we act as our own activist. And I find that corporations do that, which is a very healthy thing to do. They basically say, if an activist was going to look at us, what are our vulnerabilities?

Rob Kindler: And by the way, out [00:15:30] of that, sometimes comes, often, comes strategies that make sense to do. We should spin off this business, we should sell this business. I'm of the view that activism overall. Has been good for corporate governance and for corporations. There's obvious exceptions to that, and there's obviously very notable exceptions to that where people just get it wrong.

Rob Kindler: But overall,

Kison: I think it's been healthy. One of the things I write a lot about is just buyer led M&A. It's what I've seen M&A functions evolve to when [00:16:00] they do their first deal. It could be very seller led. The banker brings the deal to them. Then you get a very robust, like any of the big tech companies, they're proactively sourcing deals against their strategy and then they proactively plan on integrating the deal as early as possible.

Kison: That's why you end up with all these people in the house that are just very. Proactive about how they get this deal to get fully integrated and receive the value of it. But some of the things that aligned to that could make me think of how we just talked about how the role of the legal advisors has changed, and the role of the bankers has [00:16:30] changed.

Kison: Is there anything else that you've seen or do you. Even see that kind of similar evolution in terms of buyers being more proactive in the deal process itself?

Rob Kindler: Absolutely. Even relatively small companies under a billion dollar market cap, which is now a relatively small market cap company, all have very active corporate development staff.

Rob Kindler: And they're all former banks, well not, but mostly they're former bankers. Sure. They out there sourcing deals.[00:17:00]

Rob Kindler: Just because there's just a lot of uncertainty in the market, but M&A is critically important for companies. There's a couple of ways of getting growth in the world. One way you should just grow your business. Organic growth, that's tough to do, particularly for tech companies where prices actually often come down, and even for industrial companies, it isn't pricing.

Rob Kindler: That can increase your growth. People are looking for earnings growth, [00:17:30] revenue growth and that kind of thing. M&A is critically important for that. So yeah, there may be something of a slowdown of M&A this year, or to date this year, but ultimately, M&A is critical to companies. They cannot grow without it.

Rob Kindler: Just simple as that.

Kison: And with that, the better you're aligned to capturing that growth against your strategy is ultimately what delivers the best results.

Rob Kindler: Absolutely these very large companies, people do pay attention to the larger deals, [00:18:00] but they're doing, I don't know about hundreds, but they're certainly doing scores of smaller deals all the time.

Kison: How do firms decide which deals to pursue or pass on, and what role law firms play in selecting the best horse and transaction?

Rob Kindler: I think with law firms, it's really not strategy focused. It's really regulatory focused. There were a lot of people who believed that coming into this new administration that it would be [00:18:30] easier to do deals than the past in the immediately proceeding administration.

Rob Kindler: I actually agree with that to a certain point in what happened in the last four years. Is that you had an administration that was literally rejecting every deal, including on entirely new theories, actually not even new theories on theories of antitrust that had been debunked long ago, which is that [00:19:00] vertical mergers are a problem, et cetera, et cetera, from that perspective.

Rob Kindler: What was very helpful about the first Trump administration and about this Trump administration is I think they take a much more practical view. So I'll just give an example. In Sprint T-Mobile, that was a deal that couldn't get done under a Democratic administration that got done under the last Trump administration that dealt with T-Mobile.

Rob Kindler: [00:19:30] Merging with Sprint has proved to be incredibly beneficial to consumers. Because now you have at least three very high quality competitors in the wireless space, but that just couldn't happen beforehand. I actually remember back in the nineties when MCI tried to merge with Sprint. It was under a Democratic administration, and you may remember MCI and Sprint.

Rob Kindler: They were the long [00:20:00] distance companies. They were the inexpensive, long distance companies. And the government blocked it. I was a lawyer back then. We said to the government, what are you talking about? Long distance isn't even a thing anymore. We were in the era of mobile phones and of all these regional phone companies, it doesn't even exist anymore.

Rob Kindler: And of course we were right, but they still blocked the deal. So you can see in the first Trump administration and you can see now, they approve the cap one deal with discovery. And that made total sense. That [00:20:30] made total sense to have another. A very successful credit card company in a world where you have Visa, MasterCard at American Express.

Rob Kindler: It's not that it's going to be easier in that the Trump administration the first time and this time looked closely at the antitrust aspects of deals as they should. They actually were in an era now where you know you're going to get a practical common sense view as to whether things are good or [00:21:00] bad for consumers rather than what we've had over the last four years, which is an ivory tower view that everything was bad by definition.

Rob Kindler: The other thing just to note is that people focus on the US regulatory aspects, but the European, it's been very difficult to get deals approved in Europe for a very long time.

The

Rob Kindler: gating item and timing actually has been Europe rather than the US. So the idea that there was gonna be a floodgate of new [00:21:30] transactions, of new large transactions, I'd never really accepted just because we had the overlay of the European Union looking at deals.

Rob Kindler: So I think we're going into an era where, yes, there'll be more deal activity. Once we have less market volatility. Yes, you'll be able to get deals done in the US that you couldn't have gotten done before. But regulation from a client perspective is still the single most important issue.

Kison: The legal view is an aspect.

Kison: It's big on the regulatory [00:22:00] perspective of the likeliness of the deal actually getting done.

Rob Kindler: Yeah. Well, Hawaii, we've obviously got a large London office. You also have a large Brussels office. I was just in Brussels last week and we've been fortunate enough to attract some of the leading lights in regulation in the US and there, and that's critically important.

Rob Kindler: That's what you have to have in order to really give the right advice to clients. I. Lawyers really don't give strategic advice. I, of course, give advice on everything 'cause I can't help myself.

Kison: Have you seen deal structures? In [00:22:30] the past four decades, depending on interest rate, you try to push for using more earnings or bridging valuation gaps or having the owner hold financing.

Kison: Is there anything different than you've seen over time that evolve or maybe fluctuate depending on how the economy's doing?

Rob Kindler: The great thing about being an M&A person is that you can argue that it's always a great time for Rex.

Kison: I agree.

Rob Kindler: If the stock market is up. It's great. You can do stock deals. If the stock market's down, you can do can.

Rob Kindler: It's always great for M&A except when it's not. I don't [00:23:00] think structures fundamentally have changed. I really don't think that they have changed. It's still the case that if you have a very robust stock market with very high valuations, it's going to make sense to use stock

Kison: for larger deals. For private companies, I guess you can roll over equity.

Kison: I've seen that, oh, becoming more and more common with a lot of private equity firms that tend to do that.

Rob Kindler: No one should ever underestimate the ability of private equity firms to maneuver [00:23:30] regardless of what the economy or the markets are. Because in challenging markets or challenging credit markets. These private equity firms are very skillful in buying up the debt of troubled companies or even buying up the debt of companies that they've taken private.

Rob Kindler: Yeah. There are challenges right now in the market because we happen to be in a very volatile market sitting here right now, so it is difficult to transact. That will pass. Now, a lot of people think it's just [00:24:00] challenging with all the political things going on. There's always been choppy markets.

Rob Kindler: I've been through this thing since I was in London in 1987 with Black Monday. I've been through all of these markets. My own personal view is that the market's been very overvalued. I. For a while. If you look at the s and p, I haven't looked at the numbers in the last week or so, but I think in the last 24 months, the s and p is up 40%.

Rob Kindler: So if it goes down by [00:24:30] 20%, it's not earth shattering. The markets are still very robust and there was going to be a correction. If you look at what the forward multiples were for companies before this latest, if you can call it a correction, market correction, they were very high. For whatever the reason that you have a volatile market, it's very hard to do M&A in that we are gonna have something of a pause.

Rob Kindler: We had a situation just last week where we put in a very [00:25:00] high bid for a company, a public company, and. They basically said, we really don't know how to value ourselves now. We really don't. There's too much flow going on and look, the tariffs will settle out. I don't think there's anyone who doesn't believe that at some point there will all settle out.

Rob Kindler: I. But no one knows exactly the timeframe for that. So it just becomes difficult to do deals. Now I think it's gonna be relatively fine, but relatively slow

Kison: for the next three or four months. Okay, teach me how to [00:25:30] negotiate. We have four decades of experience. I wanna learn, shorten my learning curve here.

Kison: This aspiration is the business I'm running now. We got about 48 employees. We're right at 10 million run rate. IMA in my DNA is exciting, but I evolve this business MA platform. Terms, I feel like there's always a an as bid spread on pretty much every deal. How do you structure it? Do you sit there and think about multiple scenarios?

Kison: Is there a way to really get another person's head and figure out [00:26:00] what it's gonna take to get this deal done? You take them out, get 'em so many cocktails to sort of get them to teach me how to do this. Thank you

Rob Kindler: for pointing out that I've actually done this a lot over the last 44 years. I recently built a house and.

Rob Kindler: You noted, I am very well known to be one of the best negotiators in the business, and because of my skill, it only cost two and a half times what it was supposed to cost and took twice as long to build. So, um, I'm not sure that I'm the best negotiator for myself, but it usually works. [00:26:30] I actually think, and there's lots written about the Art of negotiation experience does matter because if you know what the end of the movie should be.

Rob Kindler: Then you know how to approach things upfront. That's really the most important aspect. I, you know, am involved in negotiations all the time. My client says, well, I want to take this position. I say, that's fine, but you're not going to get it. But that's fine. We can do that and maybe we'll trade it for this.[00:27:00]

Rob Kindler: But of course, explaining why, being able to explain to a client why the other side, the rational reason why the other side of a transaction is not gonna accept it. That's invaluable. People don't dig in on that. It is something of an art and takes time to learn, and it's the most enjoyable part of what I do.

Rob Kindler: I really enjoyed my time at Morgan Stanley for lots of reasons. We had wonderful leadership under James [00:27:30] Gorman. Now wonderful leadership under Ted Pick. Part of my role there, I got there in 2006 with John Mack was I did all the deals for Morgan Stanley. I actually advised Morgan Stanley when they took the investment from the Japanese, when they were, who've been great partners, great partners, MUFG, and when they bought Smith Barney, when they bought E-Trade, Eaton Vance, frankly, when they spun off Discover Financial, which now.

Rob Kindler: Is merging with Capital One. It [00:28:00] was an advantage to me that I had seen kind of everything and was able to guide, again, very sophisticated executives in how to negotiate that. That was the best part of my job because I was able to, for the first time, negotiate as a principal. I was negotiating for the firm.

Rob Kindler: I was working for Morgan Stanley. I take every negotiation seriously, but when you're negotiating and you are a stockholder and you are an employee, it gives you an entirely different [00:28:30] and very good perspective.

Kison: Any examples of just deals where you had to get really creative in negotiating to get 'em done.

Rob Kindler: Now, most deals involve. Some level of that. It's hard to go into specifics without going into specific deals

Kison: around it, but we just won't name anybody or name any dates. Isn't that

Rob Kindler: the

Kison: legal protection? No names, no dates and

Rob Kindler: no, no names, no dates. This was actually way back when, and it's in a book called Dethroning the King.

Rob Kindler: Anheuser-Busch. Anheuser-Busch. I read the book, it's a very interesting [00:29:00] book and 'cause I've been involved in these things, I would always throw the king too big to fail the engine. Which was all about Cummins Engine, the man who owns the news, which was written about the Wall Street Journal takeover, but in the Throne in the King, which was when Anheuser-Busch was subject to a hostile bid by InBev.

Rob Kindler: And the way that they may have been able to avoid that was by buying Modelo, because that would've made it too big for them [00:29:30] to be owned by InBev. And so I was advising Modelo. In the first meeting that we had, which was in Mexico City, I basically told the client, I said, look, it's fine for you to go down this path of negotiating to be bought by Anheuser-Busch as a way of fending off InBev, but it's never going to happen.

Rob Kindler: Okay? What? I can tell you exactly what's going to happen when they get right to the end, they're going to use you as a stalking horse to get in Biff to raise their price and [00:30:00] right when you think that they're gonna sign up. They're gonna sign a deal with Ann. I'm, I'm just telling you that you are never going to get this deal.

Rob Kindler: Let's try to get other things. Let's try to amend our relationship with them in certain ways. And we did. We actually got some favorable changes to it. And just as I had predicted, we were literally about to sign the agreements. We got the call. Oh, we're gonna give in bed. One more chance to bid. And anyway, this is in the first 20 [00:30:30] pages of the Throne and the King, but it's basically knowing how the movie's gonna end.

Kison: Yeah.

Rob Kindler: From the client's perspective, yeah, they were somewhat disappointed that they didn't get the deal, but they were never under any illusions. They were never, and of course the postscript to that is they ultimately did get bought by Anheuser-Busch now in Bev at a much higher price because they had leverage and other things.

Rob Kindler: So ended up being fine all around. But anyway, that's one story.

Kison: I've picked this up on some of the deals I've been looking at. Like right now, [00:31:00] doing a recapitalization is a big one, and right now I'm building the relationship with the private equity firms, getting a sense of who I actually wanna work with.

Kison: But at some point it's come the wire of let's negotiate some terms and that point, that would probably be good to work with somebody that's been there, done that, and that could be a banker. The other one I found interesting too is I've seen a trend with strategics that are doing these kinds of minority recaps, but obviously they wanna.

Kison: Create a call so that they can acquire the business later. So they sort of get favorable multiplier terms upfront. But [00:31:30] again, I've, I've seen that a good experienced banker can negotiate that deal. So there's certain stipulations. You gotta produce so much revenue to exercise that call, things of that sort.

Kison: So there's some ways out of it if things didn't produce the way they wanted to.

Rob Kindler: You get to a point, and you've obviously grown your business and you have a lot of people working for you, but you do get to the point where. You may decide you want to have a partner, but reality is certain things that you don't want to do.

Rob Kindler: If you can avoid it, one thing you don't want to do is go public. [00:32:00] It's hard being a public company. It's really hard and it's particularly hard being a micro cap, and that's literally anything under a billion dollars now, and now it's hard to believe, but it's anything under a billion dollars is a micro cap company, so it's hard being a public company.

Rob Kindler: You don't want to. Sign up with a private equity firm unless you need capital. If you need capital, then they're the greatest source out there. Private equity firms have been incredibly important in to our overall [00:32:30] system. So if you didn't need the capital, you obviously wouldn't connect with a private equity firm, but if you need the capital.

Rob Kindler: They're great. They really are great. My son works for a private equity firm. We do the work for private equity firms. Actually, lawyers would be more valuable to you than bankers because we've seen every variation of deals where PE firms come in and take a stake, and the issues have to do with control, that have to do with exit.

Rob Kindler: They have to do with all kinds of things. [00:33:00] But can a private equity firm see that their only interest is making money? For you. Right. It's obviously for them, that's their only interest. Do you find the right firm that's a winner?

Kison: I agree. Yeah. A straight point on just, you gotta see what the end of the picture looks like and that way you get a sense of what's that path to, to get there.

Rob Kindler: And by the way, there, there are some people who bring in private equity firms just to do a recap and pull money out. And I'm not a, it can work, but I'm not a big fan of that. You really want a PE [00:33:30] firm that wants to give you capital to make acquisitions.

Kison: I say I'd put a majority of it primarily to go do some deals.

Kison: Yeah. In fact, that's what I'm trying to do is get a deal lined up. And have you seen where the goal here would be to line up a deal and to do a recap based on a post merger or? As opposed to just raising money beforehand.

Rob Kindler: Of course, nothing wrong with taking some money off the table. You've been at this a long time, but a PE firm is also, their motivation is to grow.

Kison: Your

Rob Kindler: motivation

Kison: is to [00:34:00] go out and do M&A. Yep. What factors determine whether an M&A deal actually delivers value, and how can companies avoid becoming another fetal failure?

Rob Kindler: That is actually fairly complicated, and I'll tell you from different perspectives. At base as a general proposition. This is a general proposition.

Rob Kindler: It all comes down to intrinsic value. So as a general proposition, you have to believe that the present value of future cash flows, [00:34:30] including if you're a strategic, whatever, synergies you can get, exceed what you're paying. Otherwise, there's zero value. At the end of the day. Intrinsic value is the most important measure.

Rob Kindler: It really is the most important measurement. It's not really as simple as that though, because there are companies that do deals and from the outside it looks like that deal was a failure. But what you couldn't judge is what would've happened had they not done the deal. Maybe they did [00:35:00] the deal to stop a competitor from buying that company.

Rob Kindler: Maybe they did a deal because they knew that their core business was extraordinarily weak. So it's almost impossible to measure where my stock would have been trading if I had never done this deal versus where it's trading, having done the deal. There are reasons beyond intrinsic value that people do deals.

Rob Kindler: It's pretty hard to end if you are a what?[00:35:30]

Rob Kindler: It's intrinsic value. It really is. At the end of the day, if you're out there doing serial acquisitions, you need to do the math around with the synergies I can get. And by the way, even though the market doesn't give credit to so-called revenue synergies, the market will give you credit for cost synergies, but not revenue synergies.

Rob Kindler: If you really believe buying this company is going to increase the revenue. I remember [00:36:00] when EMC. Bought data domain. I represented EMC in buying data domain. They paid a tremendous price based upon the historical model, but EMC had great leadership with Tucci, was brilliant, and realized that with his sales force, he knew he could sell that product and it was a huge success.

Rob Kindler: Whereas if you had done the quote intrinsic value calculation without revenue synergies, you wouldn't have gotten there. Every deal is [00:36:30] different. What is generally good is that people now are looking to do deals within their core business. So this is not one of these things where you have another Sarah Lee, which owns Haynes Stockings and Oscar Meyer baloney.

Rob Kindler: People are looking to be within their particular business. Yeah, there's some vertical aspects to it, but in their particular business and doing what we call, when I was at Morgan Stanley, we called it Value math. It was quite good. It [00:37:00] was quite, it was a quite good predictor of whether you succeeded.

Kison: You gotta be strategic.

Rob Kindler: Has to be strategic. Yeah.

Kison: What are surprises you've seen in deals? I know you worked on a lot of high profile deals, but I'm just always curious about the things that you can't predict or expect and

Rob Kindler: Well, I'll tell you, uh, a deal that wasn't a surprise, which is the last deal I did as a lawyer was the merger of a OL Time Warner, which was in 1999.

Rob Kindler: Obviously I'm [00:37:30] a lawyer again, so I've done deals since I've become a lawyer again. But the last deal I did when I was a lawyer before was a OL Time Warner. And I have to say that the lawyers on the deal, my partners at Cravath were all, we don't understand this. Why are you merging with a OL if you want to get into online?

Rob Kindler: Let's just go by Yahoo. It's one 20th of the price. We did the deal. I remember being in the boardroom and everyone was very excited about it because what happened is a matter [00:38:00] of rationality. What happened was that a OL had actually come down in price by 50% before they did the deal. And Time Warner was getting a very big premium.

Rob Kindler: So even if it went down by 50% more, it would still been an at market deal. So you understood the economics of, well, it already had come down, but for those of us, maybe it's my view about, again, I don't want to comment on crypto generally, but a lot of people's views about crypto is, it just was not [00:38:30] understandable.

Rob Kindler: It just wasn't understandable. Everyone knew that online was free in most countries, so you're gonna charge a subscription for it. The way a OL did. So that took years to unravel. But I have to say that all my partners at Cravath and I, we weren't surprised by it. And I was a lawyer on that deal, not the banker.

Rob Kindler: I really don't think anyone saw that it would be that much of a drop.

Kison: I know, yeah. Overshot intrinsic value on that one.

Rob Kindler: Just a little bit.

Kison: A little bit. Some of these things I don't, you know, I, I, uh, had a friend [00:39:00] that worked on the, the Yahoo sale, not the, I think they sold again, like really cheap, but the, well, so

Rob Kindler: Verizon bought.

Kison: Verizon, did they sell it and

Rob Kindler: then Verizon sold it?

Kison: Yeah. So when Verizon bought it, he worked on that deal. I remember when it came to the wire for pricing, 'cause they had a breach during the deal and then they had to go back and renegotiate. There was persistence that it's not gonna sell for less than what a OL sold for.

Kison: So if you look at the price, it's one 10th of a decimal place over what a OL sold for. So I'm wondering how much of this is [00:39:30] really ego versus some real factored math? Again, it goes back to the intrinsic value. There's no highly calculated formula around it. I remember when all of the yellow pages were being sold

Rob Kindler: directories.

Kison: Yep.

Rob Kindler: And it wasn't that every single person involved in that deal didn't think that directories eventually would be displaced. It was just a question of how long it would take for the melting ice cube to fully melt. I'm not really familiar with how Yahoo is doing or not doing, so I haven't really followed that.

Rob Kindler: I do remember when [00:40:00] Lycos, 'cause I advised Lycos, I don't even remember that Lycos, but that sold for $10 billion. And I was their banker for that. And then I think it ultimately resold for $110 million. There you go. But it wasn't that people in the Yellow Pages business were like blind to the fact that Yellow Pages were eventually going to be obsolete.

Rob Kindler: It was just how long could the legacy business go and how long could you, uh, run it out? So there was a degree of value math. Everyone was just wrong

Kison: on how long it [00:40:30] was. So there's a lot of that. You got this intrinsic value, but then the long-term view, 'cause all these other factors are gonna impact it and change things.

Kison: There's a whole other discussion. Yeah.

Rob Kindler: Yeah.

Kison: What else is the best thing I can learn from you about doing deals?

Rob Kindler: Well, don't ever hire me to negotiate if you bought you a house. That's one thing I can do. Don't do that.

Kison: The terms, do the recap. We can negotiate some of those terms, but I like that experience.

Kison: Someone that's seen it from the end state. I'm just wondering if there's anything to shorten, like making mistakes on deals and just things that you've seen that get overlooked.

Rob Kindler: The most important [00:41:00] thing when you're doing a deal is to be commercial, and I find that the lawyers and bankers who are most commercial and recognize what's really important and what's not important, they do the best for their client.

Rob Kindler: My protege, Scott, who's here and used to work with me, used to work for me at. He's just such a commercial lawyer. He cuts through it right away. He'll say to the client, [00:41:30] this is what you should matter to you and this is what shouldn't. And the problem with less effective lawyers is that they focus on things that just don't matter and they die on hills.

Rob Kindler: That just don't matter. And it ends up that negotiations become far too torturous. And I'm not belittling things though. Maybe different things matter to different people. But you gotta keep an eye on what's the most important thing of the deal. I've always prided myself on doing that and Paul Weiss is filled with [00:42:00] lawyers just like Scott

Kison: that that's their focus.

Kison: Alright, make sure I got that right. Representation I'm working with. There are certain things that you want. I feel like this, almost like any professional you hire, you sort of ask people for referrals, which is one thing, but just have your own peace of mind there. Ask. Like the person you described, very commercially oriented versus one that'll get caught up in the weeds negotiating a pointless deal point.

Rob Kindler: You ask around enough, you'll end up with the [00:42:30] same few names. I really think you will. I can't tell you how frustrating it can be when you have lawyers who literally are caught up in things that if they either had more experience or more common sense, some of them have a lot of experience, but not a lot of common sense.

Rob Kindler: Clients, they're not looking for swashbuckling lawyers. They are looking for lawyers who are very careful and can keep them outta trouble, but [00:43:00] knows what's important. This is not looking for someone that isn't extraordinarily careful, but again, knowing what matters. In negotiations, yes, sometimes you throw things out.

Rob Kindler: That, you know, don't really matter to you, but they're gonna matter to the other side so you can trade them later. It's just an art of doing it. I remember a long time ago, this was back in 1985, and a client, I was negotiating a deal and the client said, you go and tell the other side unless they do this, the deal [00:43:30] is off.

Rob Kindler: So I dutifully, I wasn't a partner yet. I dutifully went over and told the other side, let you do this, the deal's off. And they said, okay, well the deal's off. And I went back and reported to my client and they were like, you kidding me? The deal is off. It's like, how could you have done it? I said, well, you told me to do that.

Rob Kindler: And by the way, what they asked me to tell 'em that the deal was off on didn't make sense to me. So I learned a very valuable lesson that now we did put the deal back together and all of that. But I learned a [00:44:00] valuable lesson . First of all, when clients ask me to do that, I tell them, you call 'em up and tell 'em the deal is off.

Rob Kindler: 'cause I don't wanna have any miscommunication that it goes back to

Kison: you Yeah.

Rob Kindler: On how I delivered it or different, uh, didn't deliver it. It's also important in deals that you literally mean what you say. I tell this to clients all the time. If you're taking the position, which I understand you're gonna take.

Rob Kindler: You, you need to, and I understand it's a logical position, it's an important position. That's your position, and you have to be [00:44:30] willing to lose the deal over it, and that's okay. There are lots and lots of deals that don't get done, and that's just fine.

Kison: You've worked on some. Largest most complex deals.

Kison: Take me in the boardroom. What's the magic to like managing high stakes ego tension?

Rob Kindler: Everything with boards is keeping boards prepared. If you're going into a board meeting on an important deal and you haven't been in front of that board already three or four times, you've made a mistake. This is serious stuff and the board really has to [00:45:00] understand what they're doing.

Rob Kindler: So when you get to the final board meeting. The board, again, you go through all the issues again, but nothing should be surprising to the board. I didn't really understand this, I didn't know this. I did a deal last year where we were getting a very small premium and from the very first board meeting I just said to the board, I said, look, you have to understand the premium to market is a meaningless concept.

Rob Kindler: Markets go up, markets go down. That's not your job [00:45:30] is. Whether a 5% premium, 10% premium or no premium, you need to look at the fundamental value of the business and where it's gonna be in five years and all of that. And by the way, early on, I said to the board, 'cause again, from my banking experience, there's no way this buyer is gonna pay more than X.

Rob Kindler: No buyer similarly situated, is gonna pay more than X, by the way, that's gonna be a small premium. And the board from right on, signed off on it because they understood the [00:46:00] math. I went through with the banker who's an excellent banker, and she went through it all with the board explaining what the buyer could pay, explaining this so that a board was fully comfortable by the end of the process, doing a deal with a very low premium.

Rob Kindler: And by the way, the market loved it and the thing got overwhelmingly approved and everyone was happy. If we hadn't done the job from literally the first board meeting, it would've been a lot of board members saying, hold on a second. Now how can we agree to a [00:46:30] 5% premium? Or how could we do that? They knew exactly what they were doing.

Rob Kindler: No surprise

Kison: for the board, making sure the board is really informed. Do you just start picking at people one by one on the board and getting that alignment before you present to the whole group, or, I'm just trying to get a sense of

Rob Kindler: What I do when I advise the board is I always say any board member can call me separately.

Rob Kindler: If you have any questions about anything, you do not need to go through the CEO. You do not need to go through [00:47:00] the chairman. If you have any questions, please call me. By the way, it's pretty rare, but I think knowing that they can call, there's never been a time when I've gotten a call where I couldn't say, okay, let me go through it with you.

Rob Kindler: Lemme explain it to you, and let's share this all with the full board. There's never been a time where there wasn't something that I would share with the full board, but it's not a question sometimes you suggest to the CEO. That they go person by person to sense where they're coming from, because sometimes people [00:47:30] don't want to speak up in a big meeting, but you want to make sure that each director's comfortable.

Rob Kindler: If there's anything that's of concern that we address it,

Kison: what separates good versus great deals at the strategic level.

Rob Kindler: Sometimes it's luck, to be honest with you. Just having vision is very important. James Gorman was a great CEO and Ted Pick is a great CEO because they had a vision. They basically said investment [00:48:00] banking is very volatile.

Rob Kindler: I wanna get into much more stable businesses, which is asset management and wealth management. The vision didn't come after they did the deals. The vision came before they did the deals, and they didn't look out. And I remember so many times with James making a decision, do I write this off? Don't write this off.

Rob Kindler: That would affect a quarter. And he would always say, I don't care about the quarter. We disclose everything. We do everything. I'm looking out five years from now. [00:48:30] That is what makes great deals is basically doing something not for the sake of doing the deal, but because it's consistent with your vision

Kison: with that line.

Kison: Other thing I was gonna ask is what do you see that top CEOs get about M&A that others don't?

Rob Kindler: If you look historically, people have to see M&A as part of a growth of your core business or extension of your core business, rather than, as I said, the conglomerate mindset. I don't think we're seeing a lot of that anymore, [00:49:00] but that's what you're getting into.

Kison: So that ties back to that vision. You gotta have this really compelling long-term vision, and then the pieces of M&A fit into it.

Rob Kindler: Then you find people who do acquisitions that literally are financial engineering. Anytime there is a financial engineering meeting, I can pay this, I can get this amount of synergies, so therefore the math will get me here.

Rob Kindler: Anything that smacks of financial engineering just doesn't [00:49:30] end well. Obviously Jack Welsh was a, a masterful in many ways, but many ways, and he trained some incredible CEOs, but that was not a sustainable model. Now, everything Jack Welsh did, which was buying companies over reserving, releasing reserves, it was all out in the open.

Rob Kindler: He didn't do anything that wasn't known to the world, but it wasn't a sustainable long-term strategy. It was really a lot of financial engineering. Again, he [00:50:00] built many wonderful companies and he had many wonderful leadership skills, but if you're doing things that really are not part of a vision for the long term, just to give another example, a lot of people make mistakes when they do large stock repurchases because they look at it and they think, oh, here's the math.

Rob Kindler: If I lever up and buy my stock back, I'm increasing my earnings by X. And so if I keep the same multiple, my stock's gonna go up. The reality is that never [00:50:30] works. It's not a strategy. Sure. If you have excess cash that you don't need for building factories or doing M&A, if you truly have excess cash, of course buying back stock makes sense.

Rob Kindler: Or if you are issuing a lot of stock every year to employees, of course it makes sense to buy back stock. But buying back stock as a strategy makes no sense and never has been sense.

Kison: What do you believe about M&A that most professionals would disagree with?

Rob Kindler: Well, I don't know that most professionals would disagree with that, but [00:51:00] trying

Kison: to get your

Rob Kindler: controversial

Kison: views here

Rob Kindler: that, or give me like a rule you'd rewrite in M&A in the last, I can't believe I'm saying this.

Rob Kindler: The last 45 years I've seen it all. You can tell when a deal really doesn't make sense. You really can tell. You can tell whether it's a Hail Mary for a CEO, who believes it's gonna give them more runway. That it's someone who's otherwise their strategy's failing. And I [00:51:30] personally have never been shy about expressing that.

Rob Kindler: I just never have been. Maybe easier said than done, and maybe I've been very fortunate to be able to do that, but you can see it. You really can. Not always, obviously not always, but you can sense when the deal doesn't make sense being on the alert for that's important. There's a lot of times when someone goes to a banker and says, I'd like to buy, I am in the horn harvesting business, and I'd really like to buy a television set [00:52:00] company.

Rob Kindler: And the bankers should say, are you out of your mind? And sometimes, again, most bankers, particularly at these large institutions, are very good. Too often they say, oh, what's our fee? Yeah. And doing that. But the good bankers have longevity, don't they? They really don't. Sometimes bankers get a bad reputation, but the bankers that I know at these firms, the Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, and then at boutiques like Paul Mann's [00:52:30] firm and Player Efron and Ken Moles, are high quality people.

Rob Kindler: Who really do look for the long term, but as a practitioner generally, you know when it's a bad deal.

Kison: Yeah, that's a fair point. What's the craziest thing you've seen in M&A? Rob?

Rob Kindler: Back in the early nineties, I was negotiating a deal and the other side was a Midwest law firm and I was negotiating a point and they said, you think we fell off a Turnup truck?

Rob Kindler: You really think we fell off a Turnup truck? And then we had a meeting the next day. [00:53:00] This was at Cravath and I brought in 300 pounds of turnips and I put them on the conference table. And I have to say from that moment on, it was great because, no, I didn't think they fell off the turnip truck. There's great lawyers wherever you're from.

Rob Kindler: I always try to have fun. My brother's a comedian and I always try to do things with humor. Humor works. People who've known me for the last few years know that I always try to be funny. On deals to break a tension and try to [00:53:30] be funny. Yeah, really good thing. I remember I was on a conference call with the CEO of a company and I had my team behind me and they didn't know that I had muted the phone and he made a comment and I said, you are an idiot

Show Full Transcript
Collapse Transcript

Recent M&A Science Podcast Episodes

CEO Scott Clawson's Growth Strategy
Fixing Broken Companies Through Smart Deals with Marc Bell Part 2
How Marc Bell Turns Distressed Businesses Into Gold
M&A SCIENCE IS SPONSORED BY

M&A Software for optimizing the M&A lifecycle- pipeline to diligence to integration

Explore dealroom

Help shape the M&A Science Podcast!

Take a quick survey to share what you enjoy, areas for improvement, and topics you’d like us to feature. Here’s to to the Deal!